Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Manuel Ribeiro-Neto

Joseph G. Parambil

Published: January 2014


Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), also known as extrinsic allergic alveolitis, is a complex condition of varying intensity, clinical presentation, and natural history. It is the result of an immunologically induced inflammation of the lung parenchyma in response to inhalation exposure to a large variety of antigens.1 These are primarily organic antigens to which patients have been previously sensitized and are hyperresponsive.2,3

Back to Top


Numerous inciting agents have been described, including micro-organisms, agricultural dusts, bioaerosols, and certain reactive chemical species. In order to facilitate learning, they can be organized into microbial agents, animal proteins, and low-molecular-weight chemicals. The bacteria species thermophilic actinomycetes are some of the causative agents of farmer’s lung disease, the first HP described in 1932. They can be found within moldy hay, grain, or silage. Animal proteins are an important cause of HP, exemplified by the disease called bird fancier’s lung. The avian antigens are found typically in the droppings, feathers, or serum of pigeons, parakeets, budgerigars, canaries, chickens, ducks, and turkeys. Less common causative antigens like low-molecular-weight chemicals have been increasingly recognized as a cause of HP. As an example, workers exposed to isocyanates during the production of polyurethane foam, elastomers, adhesives, and paints have developed HP. A list of the most common antigens with their respective sources and diseases can be found on Table 1.4-6

Back to Top

Prevalence and Risk Factors

The prevalence and incidence of HP in the general population are low. In a population-based study in New Mexico from 1988 to 1990, the incidence of HP in the general population was found to be 0.3 cases per 100,000/year.7 A more recent study in the United Kingdom found a similar incidence of HP in the general population: 0.9 cases per 100,000/year.8

More useful information to clinicians is the prevalence and incidence of HP in populations exposed to potential antigens. Much of this data has been derived from studies of farmers and bird fanciers. In the medical literature, the prevalence of farmer’s lung among farmers varies from 0.4% to 4.3%.9-13 The prevalence of bird fancier’s lung among bird fanciers varies from 1.6% to 21%.11,14,15

Many risk factors have been associated with HP. All ages are susceptible, but working-age adults are most often affected. Men and women, in the other hand, are equally affected.8,10 An increasingly recognized form of HP develops in patients exposed to mycobacterial antigens present in hot tub (hot tub lung) and contaminated metal-working fluid (machine operator’s lung). Individuals with other professions and hobbies are at increased risk of developing HP: woodworkers, office workers working under forced-air systems, cheese workers, plastic industry workers, painters/refinishers, lifeguards, among others.4,5,16

Table 1: Antigens, Sources, and Diseases
Antigen Source Disease
Microbial Agents
Saccharospora rectivirgulaThermoactinomyces vulgaris, Thermophilic actinomycetes, Lichtheimia corymbiferaEurotia amstelodamiWallemia sebiAspergillus spp Moldy hay, grain Farmer’s lung
Amoebae, nematodes, yeasts, bacteria Contaminated humidifiers and air conditioners Humidifier lung; air conditioner lung
Bacteria, molds, yeasts Contaminated water Misting fountain HP
Sphingobacterium spiritivorum Contaminated water reservoir Steam iron HP
Penicillium spp Moldy cork Suberosis
Graphium spp, Pullularia spp, Trichoderma spp Moldy redwood dust Sequoiosis
Alternaria spp Contaminated wood pulp or dust Woodworker’s lung
Rhizopus spp, Mucor spp Contaminated wood trimmings Wood trimmer’s lung
Cryptortroma corticale Contaminated maple logs Mapple-bark stripper’s lung
Molds Decayed wood Domestic allergic alveolitis
Aureobasidium spp Contaminated sauna water Sauna taker’s lung
Cephalosporium spp, Penicillium spp Contaminated basements Basement lung
Mycobacterium avium complex Mold on ceiling, tub water Hot tub lung
Mycobacterium avium complex Mist from pool water, sprays, and fountains Swimming pool lung
Saccharomonospora viridisT vulgarisAspergillus spp Dried grasses and leaves Thatched roof lung
Thermoactinomyces sacchariT vulgaris Moldy pressed sugar cane (bagasse) Bagassosis
Saccharospora rectivirgulaT vulgarisAspergillus spp Moldy compost and mushrooms Mushroom worker’s lung
Aspergillus clavatus Contaminated barley Malt worker’s lung
Penicillium casei Moldy cheese or cheese casings Cheese washer’s lung
Penicillium spp Moldy sausage dust Dry sausage worker’s lung
Mucor stolonifer Moldy paprika pods Paprika slicer’s lung
Aspergillus spp, T vulgaris Compost Compost lung
Botrytis cinerea Mold on grapes Wine maker’s lung
Aspergillus spp Mold on tobacco Tobacco grower’s lung
Thermophilic actinomycetes, Aspergillus spp Moldy hay around potatoes Potato riddler’s lung
Trychosporon cutaneum Contaminated houses Summer-type HP
Bacillus subtilis enzymes Detergents (during processing or using) Detergent lung, washing powder lung
Pseudomonas spp, nontuberculous mycobacteria, Aspergillus fumigatus Contaminated metal-working fluid Machine operator’s lung
T actinomycetes Esparto dust Stipatosis
Monocillium spp, Penicillium citreonigum Contaminated peat moss Peat moss HP
Mold, bacteria Contaminated saxophones, trombone Wind instrument lung
Fungi Foot skin and nail dust Chiropodist’s lung
Animal Proteins
Proteins in avian droppings, in serum and on feathers Parakeets, budgerigars, pigeons, parrots, cockatiels, chickens, turkeys, geese, ducks, love birds Bird fancier’s lung; pigeon breeder’s lung
Avian proteins Feather beds, pillows, duvets Feather duvet lung
Pituitary proteins Bovine and porcine pituitary powder Pituitary snuff taker’s lung
Animal fur dust Animal pelts Furrier’s lung
Proteins from urine, serum, pelts Rats, gerbils Animal handler’s lung, laboratory worker’s lung
Pearl oysters proteins Dust of shells Pearl oyster shell HP
Sea snail shell protein Sea snail shell dust Mollusk shell HP
Silkworm proteins Dust from silkworm larvae and cocoons Silk production HP
Sitophilus granarius Contaminated grain Miller’s lung
Diisocyanates, trimellitic anhydride Polyurethane foams, spray paints, elastomers, glues Chemical worker’s lung
Phthalic anhydride Heated epoxy resin Epoxy resin lung
Sodium diazobenzene sulfate Laboratory reagent Pauli’s reagent alveolitis
Pyrethrum Inseticide Pyrethrum pneumonitis

Reprinted with permission from Clinics in Chest Medicine (Costabel U, et al. Interstitial lung disease chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Clin Chest Med 2012; 33:151-163). Copyright ©2012, with permission from Elsevier.

Back to Top


The pathogenesis of HP starts with repeated antigen exposure. The antigens are generally derived from organic material (microbial agents, animal proteins), but low-molecular-weight chemicals have been linked to HP as well. Their small sizes (about one micron in diameter) allow them to reach the small airways and alveoli, where most of the disease is evident.17

The inflammatory reaction that occurs after antigen exposure has been widely studied in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of patients with HP. Antibodies specific to the offending agent are increased in both serum and BAL of patients with HP, and the resulting antigen-antibody complex may play a role in the disease process. Following antigen sensitization, inflammatory cells accumulate in the lungs of patients with HP.18 Neutrophils predominate in the BAL fluid in the first 48 hours, followed by lymphocytes and macrophages.19 Lymphocytes are the main cells involved in the pathophysiology of HP, and their levels can remain elevated for years after cessation of antigen exposure.18 The numerous cytokines released by those inflammatory cells (including interferon-y and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) contribute to granuloma formation, an important histopathological feature of HP.

Back to Top

Signs and Symptoms

Three clinical presentations are recognized: acute, subacute, and chronic HP. Acute HP is marked by abrupt onset of cough, dyspnea, fever, and chest pain following heavy exposure to the offending antigen. Headache and malaise are also common. Symptoms begin 4 to 6 hours after exposure and commonly begin subsiding within 24 hours of removal from exposure. Physical exam can disclose inspiratory “pops and squeaks,” usually in the lower lung fields. Subacute HP is characterized by gradual development of the above symptoms with less severe intensity or repeated infrequent acute HP episodes.

Chronic HP involves insidious progressive dyspnea, cough, weight loss, and fatigue. Increased respiratory rate, muscle wasting, use of accessory breathing muscles, and lower lung fields’ inspiratory crackles can be found on physical exam. Digital clubbing is seen in up to half of the cases. The symptoms are progressive and can persist for months or years before the diagnosis is made. Most cases progress towards pulmonary fibrosis with chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure.

The differential diagnosis in patients presenting with the above symptoms is wide. In acute HP, viral or bacterial pneumonia should be considered due to the similarities in symptoms and signs. Organic dust toxic syndrome (ODTS) can also mimic acute HP, especially in farmers presenting with typical symptoms. It is the result of an acute heavy exposure to bioaerosols contaminated with toxin-producing fungi. Differently than HP, no specific antibodies are found in ODTS. Other diseases to think about when suspecting acute HP are toxic fume bronchiolitis (caused by nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, among other agents), psittacosis (caused by Chlamydophila psittaci), and Q fever (caused by Coxiella burnetii).4,16

In chronic HP, the differential diagnosis is different but it remains broad. A prospective cohort from the HP Study Group demonstrated this clinical challenge. After analyzing 661 consecutive patients with HP in the differential diagnosis, idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP) and sarcoidosis were the top two alternative diseases diagnosed.2 Among the IIP, the most common and also most challenging to differentiate from HP is idiopathic interstitial fibrosis (IPF). It is a chronic, progressive fibrotic disorder of the pulmonary parenchyma that occurs as an aberrant response to lung injury. It has a clinical picture similar to HP, but without a history of exposure. Part of the challenge is that often in HP a significant exposure is not identified either. Another IIP that can be a confounder in the clinical scenario is nonspecific interstitial pneumonitis (NSIP). A recent case series of six patients with HP demonstrated that NSIP can be the sole finding on lung biopsies, without evidence of granulomas.20The inability to distinguish HP from NSIP can result in failure to avoid the provocative exposure, resulting in progressive pulmonary fibrosis. Regarding sarcoidosis, many clinical characteristics distinguished HP from this disease in the HP Study Group. The two main ones were inspiratory crackles (87% in HP and 15% in sarcoidosis) and hilar and/or mediastinal lymphadenopathy (2% in HP and 46% in sarcoidosis).3 Other conditions that should be kept in mind when suspecting chronic HP are: coal worker’s pneumoconiosis (caused by coal dust), berylliosis (caused by beryllium), silicosis (caused by inhaled crystalline silica dust), asbestosis (caused by inhalation of asbestos particles), and various drug reactions.

Back to Top


Many diagnostic criteria for HP have been proposed, but they all have limitations due to the lack of consensus on disease definition and prospective data validating them.1,3,21,22 The one proposed by Schuyler suggests that diagnosis of HP requires fulfillment of four or more major criteria and two or more minor criteria.21 Major criteria are: (1) symptoms compatible with HP; (2) evidence of exposure to appropriate antigen by history or detection of antibody in serum and/or BAL fluid; (3) findings compatible with HP on chest radiograph or high resolution CT scan (HRCT); (4) BAL lymphocytosis (if BAL performed); (5) pulmonary histologic changes compatible with HP (if lung biopsy performed); and (6) positive “natural challenge” (reproduction of symptoms and laboratory abnormalities after exposure to the suspected environment). Minor criteria are: (1) bibasilar rales; (2) decreased diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO); and (3) arterial hypoxemia, either at rest or during exercise. Conditions with similar symptoms (sarcoidosis or IPF) must be ruled out to confirm diagnosis.

In order to validate clinical diagnostic criteria for HP, the HP Study Group recently undertook a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with HP in the differential diagnosis.2 Six significant predictors of HP were identified: (1) exposure to a known offending antigen, (2) positive precipitating antibodies to the offending antigen, (3) recurrent episodes of symptoms, (4) inspiratory crackles on physical examination, (5) symptoms occurring 4 to 8 hours after exposure, (6) and weight loss. This study added to the clinician’s apparatus the possibility of moving from a pre-test probability to a post-test probability based on how many predictors the patients have. The main limitation of the study relies on its applicability: most patients had acute/subacute HP and were from areas with known offending antigens.

Laboratory Tests

Laboratory tests are neither sensitive nor specific, but in acute disease complete blood count may reveal a mild leukocytosis with a left shift several hours after the exposure. Lymphocytosis and eosinophilia may be present.2,23

Specific serum antibodies may be identified by washing serum over an antigen-impregnated gel. Precipitation of antigen-antibody complex will occur if the patient has significant levels of antibody corresponding to the antigen used. The use of those circulating precipitins has been debatable due to variable sensitivities and specificities in the literature.16,24 This is reflected in the clinical setting where we may see patients with HP and no antibodies detected, or individuals with positive precipitins (meaning they were exposed to the tested antigen) that do not have the disease. However, if used in the right patient (appropriate exposure, symptoms and signs present), positive circulating antibodies increase the likelihood of HP.2,24-27

Pulmonary Function Tests

Pulmonary function tests can be normal in acute HP.27 Chronic cases typically demonstrate a restrictive ventilatory defect with small lung volumes, and decreased diffusing capacity (DLco).28 Interestingly, up to half of the patients with HP exhibit increased nonspecific airway reactivity.29 Importantly, none of the above features are specific to HP and can be present in other interstitial lung diseases.

Imaging Studies

Chest X-ray is a useful screening test. It is relatively cheap, noninvasive, and yields information regarding extent of lung involvement. Patients with acute or subacute disease may show bilateral interstitial and alveolar nodular infiltrates. The distribution could be patchy or homogeneous. In patients with chronic disease, diffuse reticulonodular infiltrates and fibrosis are evident, and honeycombing may occur. However, chest X-ray alone is not diagnostic, and a normal chest X-ray does not rule out the disease.

HRCT scan has become an essential tool in the diagnosis of HP, especially the subacute and chronic forms. The characteristic findings in subacute cases are: lobular areas of decreased attenuation or air-trapping, patchy or diffuse ground-glass opacities, and poorly defined small centrilobular nodules (Figure 1).30 In a study by Morell et al, their respective prevalence were: 75%, 65%, and 35%.31 The characteristic findings in chronic cases were well demonstrated in a study by Tateishi et al where they evaluated 62 patients with chronic HP. The most common findings were: traction bronchiectasis (100%), interlobular septal thickening (96%), and intralobular reticulation (74%) (Figure 2). The distribution of the above findings was mainly peribronchovascular (90%) with no zonal predominance (87%) in nature.32

Diagnostic Procedures

Analysis of BAL fluid may be helpful in the diagnostic evaluation of HP. A lymphocyte count greater than or equal to 25% suggests granulomatous disease such as sarcoidosis or HP. A lymphocyte count greater than 50% is particularly suggestive of HP, especially when associated with a mast cell count greater than 1% and a neutrophils count greater than 3%.33

The utility of transbronchial biopsies (TBBx) was evaluated by Lacasse et al in a very elegant study. In this study, the TBBx yielded a nonspecific result in up to 48% of samples. However, some findings had very good test characteristics when present: diffuse lymphocytic infiltrates had a likelihood ratio (LR) varying from 9 to 12 depending on its severity, and diffuse lymphocytic infiltrates combined with granulomas had a LR of 11.34 Surgical lung biopsy is a more sensitive test, and it should be pursued in the appropriate clinical scenario if the diagnosis is still uncertain.

Pathologically, subacute HP is defined by the triad of: (1) interstitial lymphoplasmocytic pneumonitis, (2) cellular bronchiolitis, (3) and giant cells or poorly formed non-necrotizing granulomas (Figures 3 and 4).35 In the chronic stages of HP, a predominantly fibrotic pattern is seen (Figure 5). The fibrosis mimics other types of interstitial lung disease, particularly usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Because of that, the diagnosis of HP should always be made in combination with clinical and radiological findings.36

Back to Top


The first-choice treatment is avoidance of the inciting antigen. If avoidance begins during early stages, it can prevent progression towards lung fibrosis. However, because the inciting antigen is not always identified, its avoidance is not always possible. Even when the antigen is known, there are challenges in eliminating the exposure. Some patients may fear losing a job, or may hesitate to remove a pet bird or give up a hobby. In addition, antigens may persist in rooms where birds have been kept for a long time.6

Systemic corticosteroids are sometimes required to treat severe disease, but there is no formal evidence that such treatment is associated with improved long-term outcomes. The only randomized controlled trial available was published in 1992 by Kokkarinen et al. Thirty-six patients with acute HP (farmer’s lung) were randomly allocated to prednisolone treatment for 8 weeks (40 mg per day on week 1 followed by a taper) or placebo. After 1 month follow-up, the prednisolone group had a significantly higher DLco. However, after 5 years follow-up no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of lung function.37

Back to Top


The mortality of patients with HP is probably higher than those with no HP, as suggested by a large epidemiologic study in the United Kingdom.8 In the United States, the total number of deaths from HP between 1980 and 2002 was 814, and the annual age-adjusted HP death rate seems to have increased during this period (from 0.09 per million in 1980 to 0.29 per million in 2002).38 However, the prognosis differs among the different presentations (acute, subacute and chronic). For example, prognosis is excellent in acute disease for patients who avoid further exposures.39

HRCT has been shown to be a very useful tool in predicting prognosis.32,40 Hanak et al demonstrated this when they studied 69 consecutive patients with HP diagnosed between 1997 and 2002. Pulmonary fibrosis was seen in 26 patients. During a median follow up of almost 6 years, there were 11 deaths (42%) in the fibrotic group and 1 death (2%) in the non-fibrotic group. The age-adjusted hazard ratio for mortality in patients with HRCT fibrosis was 4.6. Furthermore, the study showed a relationship between the extension of fibrosis and mortality: 21% mortality for <10% of fibrosis, 50% mortality for 10% to 40% of fibrosis, and 83% mortality for >40% of fibrosis.40 Pathology can also assist with prognostication, with the presence of histologic fibrosis being associated with decreased survival.35,41

Patients with chronic HP and fibrosis are also susceptible to acute exacerbations (AE) of fibrotic lung disease. Miyazaki et al demonstrated that 14% of patients with bird fancier’s lung developed AE over a 13-year period. Their study showed that some factors present at diagnosis can predict the development of future AE: low total lung capacity and DLco, low lymphocyte levels in BAL, and UIP-like pattern in histology.42

Back to Top


HP is a fairly rare disorder that is linked to either chronic or intense exposures to dust containing organic antigens. Farmers and bird keepers are among those people who are most often affected. Contaminated heating, cooling, or ventilation systems are other potential causes of this condition. Possible preventive measures for individuals who have not developed the disorder are to limit exposures to organic dusts such as composts; to clean bird cages daily; and to ensure that water contained in ventilation systems is clean.

Back to Top


HP is caused by inhalational exposure to a large variety of antigens. Corticosteroids may improve symptoms in the short term, but additional well designed studies are needed to test the long-term effects of steroids and other immunosuppressants in the care for HP patients. Prognosis is good especially in those patients who avoid the inciting antigen, but in a minority of patients the disease will progress to pulmonary fibrosis and death.

Back to Top


  • HP is caused by inhalational exposure to a large variety of antigens.
  • The diagnosis of HP requires analysis of clinical, radiological, and pathological data together.
  • When HP is suspected or diagnosed, an effort should be made to identify the inciting agent, mainly because the first and most effective treatment is antigen avoidance.
  • Corticosteroids may improve symptoms in the short term, but additional well designed studies are needed to test the long term effects of steroids and other immunosuppressants in the care for HP patients.
  • Prognosis is good especially in those patients who avoid the inciting antigen, but in a minority of patients the disease will progress to pulmonary fibrosis and death.

Back to Top


  1. Fink JN, Ortega HG, Reynolds HY, et al. Needs and opportunities for research in hypersensitivity pneumonitis [published online ahead of print January 18, 2005]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171:792–798.
  2. Lacasse Y, Selman M, Costabel U, et al; for the HP Study Group. Clinical diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis [published online ahead of print July 3, 2003]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 168:952–958.
  3. Lacasse Y, Girard M, Cormier Y. Recent advances in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Chest 2012; 142:208–217.
  4. Selman M. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a multifaceted deceiving disorder. Clin Chest Med 2004; 25:531–547.
  5. Zacharisen MC, Fink JN. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis and related conditions in the work environment. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2011; 31:769–786.
  6. Costabel U, Bonella F, Guzman J. Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis [published online ahead of print January 24, 2012]. Clin Chest Med 2012; 33:151–163.
  7. Coultas DB, Zumwalt RE, Black WC, Sobonya RE. The epidemiology of interstitial lung diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 150:967–972.
  8. Solaymani-Dodaran M, West J, Smith C, Hubbard R. Extrinsic allergic alveolitis: incidence and mortality in the general population [published online ahead of print February 16, 2007). QJM 2007; 100:233–237.
  9. Depierre A, Dalphin JC, Pernet D, Dubiez A, Faucomprè C, Breton JL. Epidemiological study of farmer’s lung in five districts of the French Doubs province. Thorax 1988; 43:429–435.
  10. Dalphin JC, Debieuvre D, Pernet D, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for chronic bronchitis and farmer’s lung in French dairy farmers. Br J Ind Med 1993; 50:941–944.
  11. Demedts M, Wells AU, Antó JM, et al. Interstitial lung diseases: an epidemiological overview. Eur Respir J Suppl 2001; 32:2s–16s.
  12. Madsen D, Klock LE, Wenzel FJ, Robbins JL, Schmidt CD. The prevalence of farmer’s lung in an agricultural population. Am Rev Respir Dis 1976; 113:171–174.
  13. Gruchow HW, Hoffmann RG, Marx JJ Jr, Emanuel DA, Rimm AA. Precipitating antibodies to farmer’s lung antigens in a Wisconsin farming population. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981; 124:411–415.
  14. Uzun O, Yilmaz DK, Sunter AT, Erkan L. The prevalence of “pigeon breeder’s disease” in a Turkish city and review of the literature [published online ahead of print April 19, 2011]. Lung 2011; 189:243–250.
  15. Christensen LT, Schmidt CD, Robbins L. Pigeon breeders’ disease-a prevalence study and review. Clin Allergy 1975; 5:417–430.
  16. Mohr LC. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2004; 10:401–411.
  17. McSharry C, Anderson K, Bourke SJ, Boyd G. Takes your breath away-the immunology of allergic alveolitis. Clin Exp Immunol 2002; 128:3–9.
  18. Girard M, Lacasse Y, Cormier Y. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis [published online ahead of print February 6, 2009]. Allergy 2009; 64:322–334.
  19. Schuyler M, Gott K, Cherne A. Mediators of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. J Lab Clin Med 2000; 136:29–38.
  20. Vourlekis JS, Schwarz MI, Cool CD, Tuder RM, King TE, Brown KK. Nonspecific interstitial pneumonitis as the sole histologic expression of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am J Med 2002; 112:490–493.
  21. Schuyler M, Cormier Y. The diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Chest 1997; 111:534–536.
  22. Richerson HB, Bernstein IL, Fink JN, et al. Guidelines for the clinical evaluation of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: report of the Subcommittee on Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989; 84:839–844.
  23. Jacobs RL, Andrews CP, Coalson JJ. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: beyond classic occupational disease-changing concepts of diagnosis and management. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2005; 95:115–128.
  24. Fenoglio C-M, Reboux G, Sudre B, et al. Diagnostic value of serum precipitins to mould antigens in active hypersensitivity pneumonitis [published online ahead of print December 20, 2006]. Eur Respir J 2007; 29:706–712.
  25. Reboux G, Piarroux R, Mauny F, et al. Role of molds in farmer’s lung disease in Eastern France. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163:1534–1539.
  26. Kaukonen K, Savolainen J, Viander M, Kotimaa M, Terho EO. IgG and IgA subclass antibodies against Aspergillus umbrosus in farmer’s lung disease. Clin Exp Allergy 1993; 23:851–856.
  27. Selman M, Pardo A, King TE Jr. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: insights in diagnosis and pathobiology [published online ahead of print June 7, 2012]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 186:314–324.
  28. Walsh SLF, Sverzellati N, Devaraj A, Wells AU, Hansell DM. Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: high resolution computed tomography patterns and pulmonary function indices as prognostic determinants [published online ahead of print April 1, 2012]. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:1672–1679.
  29. Freedman PM, Ault B. Bronchial hyperreactivity to methacholine in farmers’ lung disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1981; 67:59–63.
  30. Silva CIS, Churg A, Müller NL. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: spectrum of high-resolution CT and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188:334–344.
  31. Morell F, Roger A, Reyes L, Cruz MJ, Murio C, Muñoz X. Bird fancier’s lung: a series of 86 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2008; 87:110–130.
  32. Tateishi T, Ohtani Y, Takemura T, et al. Serial high-resolution computed tomography findings of acute and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis induced by avian antigen. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011; 35:272–279.
  33. Meyer KC, Raghu G, Baughman RP, et al; on behalf of the American Thoracic Society Committee on BAL in Interstitial Lung Disease. An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: the clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage cellular analysis in interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2012; 185:1004–1014.
  34. Lacasse Y, Fraser RS, Fournier M, Cormier Y. Diagnostic accuracy of transbronchial biopsy in acute farmer’s lung disease. Chest 1997; 112:1459–1465.
  35. Lima MS, Coletta EN, Ferreira RG, et al. Subacute and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: histopathological patterns and survival. Respir Med 2009; 103:508–515.
  36. Barrios RJ. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: histopathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008; 132:199-203.
  37. Kokkarinen JI, Tukiainen HO, Terho EO. Effect of corticosteroid treatment on the recovery of pulmonary function in farmer’s lung. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 145:3–5.
  38. Bang KM, Weissman DN, Pinheiro GA, Antao VC, Wood JM, Syamlal G. Twenty-three years of hypersensitivity pneumonitis mortality surveillance in the United States. Am J Ind Med 2006; 49:997–1004.
  39. Zacharisen MC, Schlueter DP, Kurup VP, Fink JN. The long-term outcome in acute, subacute, and chronic forms of pigeon breeder’s disease hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2002; 88:175–182.
  40. Hanak V, Golbin JM, Hartman TE, Ryu JH. High-resolution CT findings of parenchymal fibrosis correlate with prognosis in hypersensitivity pneumonitis [published online ahead of print April 10, 2008]. Chest 2008; 134:133–138.
  41. Sahin H, Brown KK, Curran-Everett D, et al. Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: CT features comparison with pathologic evidence of fibrosis and survival. Radiology 2007; 244:591–598.
  42. Miyazaki Y, Tateishi T, Akashi T, Ohtani Y, Inase N, Yoshizawa Y. Clinical predictors and histologic appearance of acute exacerbations in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis [published online ahead of print August 8, 2008]. Chest 2008; 134:1265–1270.